http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/11/burzynski-the-movie.aspx
Friday, 31 May 2013
Antineoplaston therapy by Dr Burzynski
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/11/burzynski-the-movie.aspx
OZONE/OXYGENATION THERAPY
Medical Ozone and Cancer
Medical ozone saves lives in Europe ,
but the FDA continues to prevent formal testing in theUnited States
but the FDA continues to prevent formal testing in the
By Ed McCabe
(This is a great synopsis, but you should get and study his book, "Flood Your Body With Oxygen". We highly recommend it. It is a treasure trove of information on ozone and oxygen therapies!)
THERE ARE OVER 3,000 medical references in the German literature showing the effectiveness and safety of ozone in over 50 years of application to humans by way of millions of dosages. The International Ozone Association and the ozone machine manufacturers report over 7,000 M.D.'s in Europe using medical ozone safely and effectively, some for more than 40 years, yet for the past 20 years the FDA has prevented human testing and issues any ozone-generating device approvals.
(Ed Note: these figures are higher now as more and more doctors and practitioners around the world learn of the incredible healing benefits of ozone therapy.)
Although in Europe ozone has been used for 50 years by over 10,000 physicians, in America
It's so simple it befuddles the great minds. Unlike healthy human cells that love oxygen, the disease-causing viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites-including the HIV and cancervirons, cancer cells, arthritis microbes, colds and flu, and West Nile virus carried by mosquitoes-like most primitive lower life forms, are almost all anaerobic.
That means these microbes and cancer cells cannot live in high oxygen concentrations. Therefore, what would happen to these anaerobic viruses and bacteria if they were to be completely surrounded with a very energetic form of pure oxygen for a long time? What if enough of this special form of oxygen/ ozone was to be slowly and harmlessly introduced into the body daily, over the course of a few months, to eventually saturate all the bodily fluids and every cell, including those of the brain, spine and bone marrow, with it? Wouldn't the disease causing microbes, and cells that, can't live in oxygen cease to exist?
Why is this so hard to understand? I was speaking to a woman with AIDS in San Francisco
All 30 or so oxygen therapies, including medical ozone (not smog), which breaks down into oxygen, work because they flood the body with Nature's single oxygen atoms. Singlet oxygen and its by-products are very energetic oxidizers-they "burn up" waste products, pollution, microbes and weak (cancerous) cells. They can't protect themselves against oxygen, because they are either inert, lower life forms or diseased. Normal body cells protect themselves from the oxidizing effects of oxygen by naturally producing their own protective antioxidant coatings.
We are 66% water. Most European and many American cities and businesses, including Sea World, purify their water by bubbling ozone through it to kill all the bacteria and viruses, etc. In Western Europe , over 40 full-scale municipal ozone facilities are installed each year. France Switzerland Germany United States
Doesn't it make sense that since your body is two-thirds water (we are internally permeated with fluids), the same water purification principles would directly apply to us? Ozone is simply infused through your body liquids to sterilize and purify them, and your organs filter out the leftover particulates, just as with drinking water.
This body purification method has been successfully applied to the human body by knowledgeable doctors treating diseased persons for over 100 years. Nikola Tesla was big on it. It's simple and it's simple because it's natural. "Natural" means high efficiency and no side effects because it enhances the natural life forces rather than fighting them. Our natural intake of oxygen from our once-natural environment's food, air and water is the way Nature intended us to keep healthy and clean, by naturally oxidizing away the microbes and toxins.
Unfortunately, due to human ego and greed, mankind has polluted the ecosystem, cut down the rainforests and ruined the oceans-the two sources where the oxygen all comes from. The ancient atmosphere had twice as much oxygen as ours does now. We are all oxygen deficient since we are surviving on less than half the oxygen our bodies are designed to run on, although most call this "normal." Our bodies can no longer take out (oxidize) the trash, so it piles up for years, and we suffer.
I have personally witnessed and counseled hundreds of cancer and other patients receiving ozone infusion therapy. What I teach is plainly evident right before your very eyes once you know what to look for. When they start out, the body fluids and blood of most patients are filthy, diseased and so empty of oxygen that the blood is almost black in color from the filth. Toxins and lack of oxygen cause disease! But keep putting the ozone into them for a few weeks, and the blood turns back to a bright cherry red, full of color, full of life-giving oxygen, and clean again. Keep the blood this clean with medical oxygen/ ozone, and the organs and cells quickly follow. Without all the garbage inside of us, we usually return to the natural health we had as children, before the dirt piled up inside us with age and gave the bugs and cancer cells a place, and a reason, to grow.
WHERE CAN YOU GO TO GET OZONE THERAPY?
Despite this dramatic and easy to reproduce proof, top-level human egos protecting power and greed ideologies are presently preventing us from fully exploring medical ozone's use in U.S. New York City Mexico New York New York Alaska Colorado Georgia
OZONE AND CANCER: HAND IN GLOVE FIT
I have shown you that ozone floods the body with oxygen, but why is that important in treating cancer? As I once said in a Canadian lecture: Doctor Otto Warburg is a two-time Nobel prize winner, in 1931 and 1944 (Hitler kept him from accepting). He got the Nobel Prize for discovering that the cause of cancer is no longer a mystery to us. We now know what the cause of cancer is. They were so astounded that he figured this out they awarded him the Nobel Prize for discovering these facts. Remember, because you do not have enough oxygen, your cells are constantly filling up with toxicity, in some people quicker than in others. The little cell gets covered with garbage, and washed in toxic fluids constantly because it's surrounded by dirty fluids.
The garbage piles up until it denies the cell 60 percent or more of its oxygen requirements. This is the root cause of cancer. Picture pouring black paint on an orange. This cell needs oxygen. Hold your breath, and when you feel short on oxygen, breathe. All your cells need oxygen, that bad, all the time. If you cover up the cell with garbage, you block the oxygen from getting into the cell. If you cover it with enough toxicity, so much that 60 percent of the oxygen it needs constantly is not there, then that cell will be so short of breath its respiratory mechanism will be damaged.
In other words, if the oxygen's not there and the cell is trying to breathe, it will become so damaged that it can't breathe anymore. And when the cell can't breath because of the damaged respiratory mechanism, it mutates to survive. The poor cell drops 31 steps, down to the level of a green plant-type cell that just grows and grows. The cell has lost all its higher functions: it no longer heals or regulates things, it no longer makes hormones, it no longer digests your food. Whatever part of the body this mutating cell is in, it's dropped down to the level of a plant-type cell that just grows and grows and grows. Cancer.
Cells do this because of our DNA wired instinct to survive. There is not enough oxygen for it to breathe, yet the cell wants to survive-since our DNA & RNA has programmed this physical vehicle/body to survive in adverse conditions-so it will stay alive in a lower form by changing to a fermentative respiration mechanism, meaning that our cells stop breathing oxygen and start fermenting glucose to make energy. Our bodies are full of glucose sugar. Our oxygen and body sugar are where we get our energy from, our adenosine triphosphate, ATP, the energy currency of the body.
So, normal cells, when denied enough oxygen by toxic slime for long enough, mutate and drop backward, devolving into a lowly plant-type cell that only ferments sugar. Now the ATP energy the cell tries to make at this point is very substandard low oxygen ATP that leaves lots of lactic acid residue. And we get no energy--Just pain from lactic acidosis, and other problems, thus damaging more cells. Around and around the damage goes, and that makes more cancer cells. It's all from a lack of oxygen.
Cancer is a fermentative disease caused by a compromised robust oxidative mechanism, giving you fermentation and uncontrolled cellular growth. Tumors are walled-off toxic waste dumps inside the body. We've seen many tumors injected directly with ozone melt from the inside out, dry up and fall off.
Let's ask two-time Nobel Prize winner Dr. Otto Warburg, himself. Here are excerpts from an article based on a lecture delivered at Stuttgart May 25, 1955 , before the German Central Committee for Cancer Control. It was first published in German [Naturwissenschaften 42,401 (1955)]. This translation was prepared by Dean Burk,Jehu Hunter and W. H. Everhardy of the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda , MD.
"The era in which the fermentation of the cancer cells or its importance could be disputed is over, and no one today can doubt that we understand the origin of cancer cells if we know how their large fermentation originates, or, to express it more fully, if we know how the damaged respiration and the excessive fermentation of the cancer cells originate.
"But, even for cancer, there is only one primary cause. Summarized in a few words, the main cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar."
"Because no cancer cell exists, the respiration of which is intact, it cannot be disputed that cancer could be prevented if the respiration of the body cells would be kept intact."
"But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause [are]. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention.
"That the prevention of cancer will come, there is no doubt, for man wishes to survive. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men [and women] must die of cancer unnecessarily. "
There is plenty of further documentation proving "ozone works" to be found in major journals, some in the U.S. Europe . (See my publication "03 vs. AIDS" or my web site: www.edmccabe.net for hundreds of solid medical references about ozone treatments for all diseases.) Here is how ozone is properly delivered to the body.
CLINICAL MEDICAL OZONE USAGE
The first thing to keep in mind is that not all ozone treatment is the same, and the effectiveness of any ozone treatment increases with the number of times it is given per day or week, the strength of the concentrations used, the quantities applied, and the delivery methods used. For example, 50 ccs of ozonated blood re-injected into you in a clinic every other week is nowhere near as effective as drinking ozonated water at home every day. Quantity, concentration and frequency are the keys. The aim is to safely and comfortably flood the body with oxygen by slowly building it up as you detoxify.
General guidelines: For best results during the treatment phase, ozone is applied once or twice daily, or perhaps every other day, in concentrations varying from I to 80 micrograms per cubic milliliter (mcg/ml3), in as great a quantity as can be safely and comfortably absorbed by the body. This is continued for as long as it takes, until the problems go away. Mild diseases may take a few treatments; chronic ones, several months. Very weak ozone concentrations of less than 0.05 parts per million by volume of air are commonly and safely inhaled during normal activities by hundreds of thousands of people; in fact, I'm doing it as I am writing this. Ozone air purifiers are very common, but this is a separate discussion.
The lower concentrations and quantities of ozone will aid healing and stimulate the immune system slightly, but these are usually ignored in favor of the real power of medical ozone, which is found to be generally centered around daily applications of 27 mcg/mI for internal work. Higher concentrations are used for external body work. The upper range tops out at around 70 mcg/ml3, and beyond that is controversial. These concentrations are never allowed to enter the lungs, which are too sensitive for anything other than concentrations around normal air levels of ozone or slightly higher.
I have interviewed hundreds of doctors, and thousands of patients using oxygen therapy. Here are the three top clinical ozone delivery methods used worldwide, and my ranking of them, the most effective one listed first. These are for seriously Ill people. Please only seek out an experienced and competently trained ozone therapist professional if you pursue them. Ozone has many subtleties, and a lot of M.D.'s may act knowledgeable but have little idea what ozone is all about.
Recirculatory autohemo perfusion: Also known as polyatomic apheresis, recirculatory autohemo perfusion is the creme de la creme of ozone delivery. Dirty, dark, diseased blood is taken out of one arm and ozonated with 27 mcg/ m13 ozone, and filtered, outside the body. Then the remaining clean, bright red, freshly sterilized and oxygenated blood is put back into the other arm. It's a complete body blood wash, highly effective in all ailments because the ozone-oxidized leftover garbage of dead microbes, diseased cells and detoxified by-products drops out of the blood into the external filters. The waste products are not sent back through the liver, kidney and lymph systems to irritate and perhaps weaken the body further,
As occurs in all other ozone methods. All other methods are handicapped by comparison. This method is so good that the medical industrial complexImmediately shuts down any attempts to test it, in any country. I knew of one dying patient who, during the first treatment, got up off the stretcher and walked out after just a few hours of this treatment.
IV slow injections of the 03 gas: No air with its non-absorbable nitrogen, just pure medical grade oxygen turned into medical grade ozone, which is injected through butterfly needles at a rate of I cc per minute into the blood, once or twice daily. Ten-cc syringes filled with 27mcg/ml3 ozone are used, one at a time, and refilled as needed, until you begin to get a chest, or throat, tickle or cough. When the body thus indicates it is full to overflowing, you stop the injection immediately. For safety, direct IV's are only given to patients who are lying completely flat before, during and after treatment, so t the ozone/ oxygen is slowly and evenly distributed throughout the body.
This was the most advanced and aggressive method around until the recirculatory autohemo perfusion came along, and is far more effective than autohernotherapy (see below). It is cheaper than both, due to using less equipment. Direct IV ozone is very effective, but its not found very often because the Germans-and the Americans who learn from them-are reluctant to use direct IV work due to habit and in some cases their investment in the machines they already have.
Autohemotherapy: This involves withdrawing approximately 600 ml of blood and re-infusing it into the body after gently putting 27mcg/ml3 ozone into It. Fifty years of safe use on millions of patients has a lot of weight. The drawback to its real effectiveness is that it is usually given only once or twice a week, because the patients can only afford that many treatments. If the doctors would switch to direct IV, the patients would pay the same but triple their bang for their bucks.
HOME OZONE TREATMENTS
In no particular order of effectiveness, since no studies have been done, and treatment times and dosages vary so widely that we can't really compare them, here are the most common home self supplement type ozone treatment methods that I recommend, and use myself.
Ozone sauna suit / bagging: Any or every body part, except the head, soaks in a bag full of humidified 27 mcg/ml3+ ozone for 15 minutes up to two hours or longer. You can use higher concentrations. Be careful not to breathe it. At a national health expo, a famous futurist's wife was so sick she couldn't leave their hotel room. A friend put her in aozone sauna suit, and she soaked up the humidified ozone through her skin for an hour. While in the bag she was throwing up from her illness, but one hour later she was well enough to go out to dinner with us!
Ozone steam cabinets: This involves sitting in a small steam chamber or being washed with hot high concentration ozonated steam/water below 40 degrees C., after which temperature the ozone is destroyed by the heat. This should be done for 20 minutes, up to one hour for the brave. Water carries ozone into the body, where the ozone saturates the body capillary networks transdermally. The entire body absorbs ozone except for the head. If used often enough, this method rivals autohernotherapy in dose loading, and it can be done at home. Be careful not to breathe it.
Ozone rectal insufflation: There are two methods. In the first an average of 1 1/2 liters of 27 mcg/ml 03 gas is infused up to three times a day into the colon and gently held for two minutes; if you're not able to hold it that long, repeat. You may experience cramps until you clean out. The new "Mr. Oxygen Method" Tm uses two catheters inserted into a clean colon, one way up, the other short. Ozone continually goes into the long one and soaks into the miles of blood vessels around the colon, and any excess oxygen vents out of the short one, for up to an hour.
Ozone charged drinking water: Bubble 03 into water, which must be imbibed immediately all daylong while the 03 is still in the glass. Be careful not to breathe it.
Ozone vaginal insufflation: Average 5-15 minutes of insufflating the body cavity.
Ozone ear insufflation: Average 5 minutes of letting 03 fall Into the ear cavities. Don't put pressure on eardrum.
Ozone air purification: Continual low levels of ozone sterilize and rejuvenate the room air. 03 breathed in very low ambient concentrations (please seek guidance) slowly cleans the lungs and therefore the blood, over time.
You need plenty of water and antioxidant support while doing any of the above. Many people often combine two or more of the above methods. Any one of the high-dosage home methods can be better than another if you can safely do it longer stronger, and more often. The trick is to always balance ozone dose loading versus the detoxification process that occurs as ozone moves out the garbage. Keep it mild and gentle, slow and steady, and do not waver.
I have seen many people sent home to die with cancer, who then used proper ozone therapies and ended up perfectly healthy 5 years later. But they stuck to a full protocol-getting it daily, in the right dosages and the right concentrations, and combining it with other significant modal Ines. People who are too far gone, have never tried it, have only "dabbled" in it or have gone to a well meaning but under-trained ozone therapist are the ones who end up being the nay-sayers.
Go ahead and ask anyone who is disrespecting ozone: Did you work up to using at least 150 cc (not the starting dosage) of 27-42 mcg/ml concentration strength of only pure medical ozone gas? Was it applied once or twice a day, every single day, for at least six weeks? Was the ozone delivered by IV or better? If anyone said it's dangerous or ineffective, they're doing it wrong! Ninety-nine percent of the many successful ozone-using people who I have interviewed-and written or spoken about-have received ozone only this proper way. And none were hurt. Those who use ozone correctly continue to come back for more, because they realize the benefits within their own bodies.
The German Medical Society has published that 384,775 patients were treated with ozone with a minimum of 5,579,238 applications and the side effect rate observed was only .000005 per application! The report also stated "The majority of adverse effects were caused by ignorance about ozone therapy (operator error)." The University of Innsbruck's Forensic Institute published Dr. Zacob's dissertation quoting this in The Empirical Medical Acts of Germany.
Please only work with competently trained healthcare professionals who are real ozone specialists skilled in the oxidative modalities.
Copyright 2000 by Ed McCabe. All rights reserved.
This article is a part of the much larger body of work from Ed McCabe. He has been investigating, teaching and publishing about oxygen therapies for 12 years. He wrote the revealing "Ozone vs. AIDS and Cancer," which details the history and suppression of ozone therapies in the U.S. A New Way
HYDRAZINE SULPHATE
Hydrazine Sulphate - controvery rules!
In the late 1960s Dr Joseph Gold had a flash of lateral thought. Instead of tackling the cancer cells, why not tackle the ultimate cause of death in many cancer patients having chemotherapy, namely cachexia? Estimates vary but Gold concluded as many as three quarters of patients on chemotherapy may actually die from cachexia (debilitation and weight loss) rather then the actual cancer.
Why not tackle the ultimate cause of death in cancer patients havingchemotherapy?
Cancer cells are different. Unlike normal healthy cells that produce their energy in the mitochondria, or power stations, burning carbohydrate in the presence of oxygen, cancer cells burn glucose in the absence of oxygen and inside the body of the cell.
The waste product from the cancer cell is very specific: A form of lactic acid, rather like the chemical that causes cramp in athletes. Lactic acid is obviously harmful to the body and so passes to the liver where it is broken down. A by-product of this process is ......... glucose!
They are really rather clever, these cancer cells. They take over the host and use its own systems to generate their food supply, just as a parasite might do. The cancer cell´s energy process is much less efficient than that of a healthy cell, and it needs lots of glucose too, thus draining the body. All this, coupled with certain damaging effects of chemotherapy can produce the debilitation and weight loss.
Gold proposed hydrazine sulphate (HS) as this anti-debilitating agent because it could inhibit the gluconeogenic enzyme at the heart of the problem.
Hydrazine sulphate seemed to amplify the effect of the chemotherapy yet appeared to have no side effects
He then argued that if the tumour energy gain and the host energy loss (resulting from the cancer-induced, excessive gluconeogenesis) were actually interlinked, hydrazine sulphate could probably break the downward spiral and prevent the parasite cancer cell being continually fed its favourite food.
Using rats and mice for his first experiments, he showed that the above hypothesis was true. Without direct cytotoxicity, hydrazine sulphate seemed to prevent body weight loss, whilst amplifying the effect of the chemotherapy. The chemical also appeared to have no side effects of its own.
The Politics Begin
Gold´s theory was popularised in the mid- to late-nineties. Here we reproduce what a number of journals and articles claimed at the time:
On 8 March 1976 congressman James Hanley requested a progress report on Hydrazine Sulphate (hydrazine Sulfate in the USA) from the National Cancer Institute. They provided an answer saying that clinical trials had taken place in Russia (Dr Michael Gershanovich) and no evidence of effect had occurred. In fact a few days later the actual report emerged from Russia saying the opposite! "Clinical observations enabled us to state a definite effect of Hydrazine Sulphate in patients, when other measures failed" (Seits, Gershanovich et al Vopr Onkol 21, 45 1975). Because of the positive findings, the Russians actually enlarged the test!
Clinical Trials
By 1975, a phase II clinical trial from Russia using ´factually terminal´ patients reported that 58 per cent demonstrated anti-cachexia response and 35 per cent anti-tumour response. The trial was then enlarged. A second pharmaceutical-sponsored study of 84 terminal patients produced responses of 59 per cent and 17 per cent respectively.
Clinical observations enabled us to state a definite effect of Hydrazine Sulphate in cancer patients, when other measures failed
By 1979 the Soviet study was enlarged to 225 patients, with 65 per cent and 44 per cent responses respectively. This was reported in March 1979 (Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research).
Critics rounded on the Russian research suggesting it had not been conducted properly, with inadequate controls and so on.
Fans of Hydrazine sulphate then witnessed the US authorities response, but claimed the first studies were nothing short of scandalous; with people recruited for trials dying within 11 days of the start, or no controls exerted over other drugs administered, often those which inhibit the action of HS. So still no one had a clue whether Hydrazine Sulphate was indeed helpful, or simply just quackery.
Finally in 1981, the American Cancer Society sponsored a double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial and by 1984 reported that in 38 patients with all manner of cancers, HS had shown activity. "Alteration of abnormal host metabolism could result in measurable clinical benefits, including weight improvement and stabilization" (Chlebowski, Heber, Richardson, Block, Cancer Research 33, 1984).
This breakthrough research should have put an end to the politics. It didn´t. And it still continues today. Gold, who stayed silent throughout, finally presented a personal review of it all - with an appendix of 78 peer group papers on the subject (The Truth About Hydrazine Sulphate: Dr Gold Speaks. www.hydrazinesulphate.org/). This 2004 paper is his first public comment on it all.
Activity
Hydrazine Sulphate is a low cost chemical and this simple truth may account for much of the politics. However it can be contaminated and so has to be supplied by a reputable dealer.
Hydrazine Sulphate is a low cost chemical but has to be supplied by a reputable dealer
It is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. It is incompatible with tranquilisers, barbiturates, alcohol and other central nervous system depressants. They can destroy its action. Also foods high in Tyramine, for example aged cheese or fermented products, are to be avoided.
Perhaps the most recent apparent ´scandal´ belonged to the NCI who reviewed the product in 1994 (Journal of Clinical Oncology) and said, basically, that it didn´t work. However they appear not to have been very strict in controlling the intake of the Trial sample. A review of the Trial, under direct orders from Congress, revealed that 94 per cent of the patients had taken benzodiazeprine or phenothiazine, 50 per cent on a long-term basis (Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 1995), thus wiping out the effect of the Hydrazine Sulfate!
Fans believe that In all of these Clinical Trials two studies stand out. The Russian study above, and a study which subsequently corroborated it by Harbor, UCLA (Filov, Gershannnovich et al, Invest. New Drugs 13, 89-97 1995). If this were replicated in real life in Britain we could expect of every 100,000 late stage cancer patients treated, perhaps 50,000 would show measurable symptom improvement and 40,000 actually some regression. If these results were true this is not something to hide or belittle? The problem is that the waters have been muddied; whether that is because all the research has been poorly prepared as sceptics will claim, or because Hydrazine Sulphate would be an inexpensive route to increase survival time at the expense of drugs, your guess is as good as mine!
Side Effects
Patients claim a more positive outlook on life
Few are reported; sometimes tiredness, a little dizziness, pins and needles and occasional nausea. Usually though the patients claim a more positive outlook on life.
Latest Developments
The Russians are still using HS and claim great effect. In Russia HS is called Sehydrin, also the trade name in the Western World, and they have completed studies on all manner of cancers from lung to brain tumours (see http://scri.ngen.com).
I started looking into HS for my daughter who had a grade IV brain tumour. Of most relevance to her condition is a Russian study published in 1994. Patients with malignant brain tumours having chemotherapy and taking hydrazine sulphate apparently had symptom response of 61 per cent and partial regression of 71 per cent, quite incredible findings given the Lancet paper of February 2004, which basically says that no Western brain tumour chemotherapy drugs actually work!
Cancer Treatment
Dosage usually starts low and builds to 180gms maximum. It is recommended that you work with a doctor at all times on the treatment programme - a doctor with experience of using hydrazine sulphate.
Remember: no barbiturates, sedatives, tranquilisers, alcohol, anti-depressants.
And avoid all cheese, all fermented products, smoked fish and meats, and even monosodium glutamate.
WARNING
It should be noted that the National Cancer Institute has fervently denied all allegations against it.
Wikipedia reports that a 17 year old Clinical Trial at the Petrov Cancer Institute in St Petersburg, found only questionable evidence of performance (less than 1 per cent) and that the trial was improperly handled.Wikipedia also report that the trials at Harbor-UCLA Medical Centre were criticised by the Journal of Oncology.
Wikipedia also reports that, although Hydrazine Sulphate has only mild side-effects in the short term, it is in fact both toxic and carcinogenic.
Wikipedia notes that the use of Hydrazine Suplhate was popularised by Kathy Keaton, wife of Penthouse owner, Bob Guccione. Kathy had breast cancer. Three articles were produced in support of Hydrazine Sulphate before her death.
As readers may know, the independence of editorial content on Wikipedia is nowadays highly questionable. A variety of editors block, rewrite and alter articles about complementary and alternative health matters. Accurate articles on both CANCERactive and Chris Woollams were taken down from Wikipedia after editorial challenge. This is sadly the nature of the competitive world in which we live.
Cancer Research UK calls Hydrazine Sulophate, ´Rocket Fuel Treatment´,because of Hydrazine´s links to certain rocket fuels. They pose the question, from a mythical person ´I have heard about a cancer treatment made from rocket fuel. What is this and could it help me?´. Well, that should certainly scare everyone off!
CRUK describes the ´early´ Russian research as ´not randomised´, and the results ´doubted by doctors´. It then talks of 4 unspecified research studies where placebos were involved in the USA, dismissing three and saying the fourth showed some small increase in weight amongst patients.
Cancer Research UK states that it is a nutritional supplement, shows no effect as a cancer treatment, but may provide a small reduction in weight loss to patients on chemotherapy.
Readers should always consult a fully qualified medical professional before taking, or refraining from taking, any action.
The final words
At the end of the day, cutting blood glucose levels is crucial to survival and there are plenty of ways you can do that - from diet to exercise.
Weight loss can also be overcome through a healthy Diet - you can always eat whole pasta not refined; you can eat raw vegetables that contain good calorie levels, you don´t have to eat saturated fats and sticky buns.
Cachexia means people actually die from the drugs they take. That is the fact that really has to be solved. Loading cows´ dairy (with growth hormone) and glucose into the body, merely feeds the cancer your oncologist is trying to eradicate. Fact.
Sunday, 12 May 2013
Baking soda is one the cheapest cures for cancer suggested by Dr Tulio Simoncini.
Further details are available on the links below
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_nMVShU3U
http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/Simoncini.html
Another documentary on cancer cures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsOPzBHPsqM
Further details are available on the links below
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_nMVShU3U
http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/Simoncini.html
Another documentary on cancer cures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsOPzBHPsqM
Hello All,
This blog is for all who want to share information on cancer therapies that are less prevalent.
During past few weeks I went through a lot of literature on cancer industry and various popular therapies such as chemotherapy, surgery, radiation etc. Although I am not a medical doctor, but during the course of my study of all the literature related to alternative cancer cures, I had a feeling that these cures have not been given the due importance by either media or by the medical fraternity. These alternative cancer therapies do deserve a frank discussion with all aspects discussed without prejudice. You may wonder why I used the words "cancer industry" . Well, once you go through the information on this blog you too may call cancer an industry. To start with, cancer is source of $ 100 billion income for all the concerned "industrialists". And who are the industrialists? They are all the big players in pharma industry, reputed cancer research institutes and all the big money spinning hospitals complete with their costly scanning, testing and investigative machines who break even their heavy procurement costs through the hapless cancer patient. Once someone is declared a cancer patient, he is welcomed into this production line of cancer industry as a raw material. He is thrust into an abyss of endless tests, chemotherapies, surgeries, radiations each contributing there bit into the billion dollar turnover that serves as fodder to this behemoth called cancer.
Would anybody believe if someone tells you that the american Cancer Research Institutes are engaged in curbing new promising cancer cures to help the patent driven pharma industry. Or to say more directly they are engaged in fraud and criminal activities including murder of any doctor who comes up with a cure that challenges the kingdom and vice like grip of the big players of this industry.
Why should all this be a part of a blog that intends to share information on cancer. Well, because this cancer research cartel is very strong to the extent that they control main stream media and even influence government policies to keep their market going. Only way to beat them is through social media on internet. Only way in which alternative cancer cures can be made popular is through sharing experiences among people. Also public opinion can be generated through links in main stream media in favour of these cancer therapies by encouraging doctors to take up clinical trials on these alternative cancer cures. The big pharma will never undertake clinical trials on easily available cancer cures because it doesn't help their patent regimes.
Please share the info on this blog with as many people as possible. Doctors can play a very important role in encouraging people to take up these therapies.
Doctors who are genuinely interested in saving lives can develop various techniques to administer the various drugs given in this blog to willing patients.
Please send your feedback on the various therapies given in this blog.
Dhananjay Kale (shkale10@gmail.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)